TRADE TEMPLATE
NEW TEAM:
PLAYER > CONTRACT/REWORKED > RFA/UFA STATUS

IF Prior Team paying part of player Contract post as follows

PRIOR TEAM

PLAYER > CONTRACT PAYMENT

Headline News
Powered by RSS Feed Informer

Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by HELLFISH on Thu Feb 04, 2016 12:46 pm

Player signed as FA that is with in the 3-6 MLB year will now be eligible for arbitration for year 3-6 (ARB3 - ARB 6), Option year past ARB 6 would again follow ARB 6 or Option. 
 
MLB Rule: 
Player with at least three full seasons of MLB service time, and less than six. Players with six or more years of service time become free agents after their contracts have expired, while players with less than six seasons are under team-control. Up until players have acquired three seasons of service time, their salary is determined solely by their team. For years three through six, players can take their salary demands to an arbitration panel if they can’t reach an agreement with their team.
 
But if we sign a player past the Arbitration years (7th MLB service year) then that contract would be excluded from ARB rule.  
 

Examples Below. 
On TJ Roster: 


Yasiel Puig (LAD-CF,RF) OG Contract 6 years + OPT for $5M per (was 0 MLB at signing) 
$5/$5M/$5M or ARB 3 / $5M or ARB 4 / $5M or ARB 5 / $5M or ARB 6 / Opt Year 6.5M or ARB 6

Eugenio Suárez (CIN - SS) OG Contract 2 years + OPT for $800K per (Was 1 MLB at signing) 
$800K/800K/ Opt Year 1.8M or ARB 3

on Durham Roster: 

Abraham Almonte (CLE-LF,CF) OG Contract 4 years + OPT for $3M per (was 2 MLB at signing) 
$3/$3M or ARB 3 / $3M or ARB 4 / $3M or ARB 5 / $4M Opt Year 6.5M or ARB 6


Excluded Example
on Durham Roster: 


Erasmo Ramirez (TAM- SP) OG Contract 4 years for $3M per (was 4 MLB at signing) 
but player is excluded due to offer going past 6 MLB years of service and contract ending in 7th year of serivce. 

So basically any multi-year deal for a player less 7 MLB could fall under Arbitration for year 2-6 if offer does not enter 7th year of service for player. 

Reason for this rule is for $$ to be paid to player that is due that $$, also trying to shadow MLB and also a way to get GM to spend $. 

again this is a suggestion and rule above may not be perfect and can be adjusted to fit our league. so that it can be voted on next off season.

_________________


HELLFISH
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by HELLFISH on Fri Dec 02, 2016 10:00 am

I need 4 GM to agree to put to vote. 
i will place a 48 time limit for GM to advise if they like to take this to vote. 

I say yes.

_________________


HELLFISH
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by Doug on Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:07 pm

Worth a shot, I'll give it a yes

Doug
Super Poster
Super Poster


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by DmanofGod1 on Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:28 pm

I want GMs to spend money but it's too complicated.

I'll pass on this one.

_________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

DmanofGod1
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by bshirt7 on Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:49 am

agreed it would make things more complicated

bshirt7
Dedicated Member
Dedicated Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by Ballbasherz on Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:29 am

Things are complicated enough in this league we don`t need to to make it worse. 

The phrase "we want to mirror MLB" is foolish because it can never happen in fantasy so trying to make this mirror MLB is just an exercise in futility. 

The general landscape of rules is fine but trying to get all the fine points into fantasy is next to impossible.

Ballbasherz
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by jimmym91 on Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:25 am

I'm out. I vote no.

jimmym91
Super Poster
Super Poster


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by nostratimus on Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:25 pm

I vote no too

nostratimus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by Xezus on Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:39 pm

nope

_________________


Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Rule Talk for 2017: year 3-6 Player Arbitration

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum