TRADE TEMPLATE
NEW TEAM:
PLAYER > CONTRACT/REWORKED > RFA/UFA STATUS

IF Prior Team paying part of player Contract post as follows

PRIOR TEAM

PLAYER > CONTRACT PAYMENT

Headline News
Powered by RSS Feed Informer

Statistics (FCC Vote)

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Stats?

100% 100% 
[ 3 ]
0% 0% 
[ 0 ]
 
Total Votes : 3

Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Admin on Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:15 pm

This is the default. Seems pretty reasonable. This good or any other ideas...

Fowards/Defensemen: Goals, Assists, Plus/Minus, Powerplay Points, Penalty Minutes, Shots on Goal

Goalies: Wins, Shutouts, Goals Against Average, Save Percentage

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Xezus on Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:11 pm

i still like the addition of either game winning goals (which occurs in every game) and or shorthanded points which might result in some ties, but i feel like with such a large roster, it wont be nearly as bad as a normal league.

_________________

avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Guest on Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:35 pm

holding off voting til more ideas come in

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Guest on Wed Feb 02, 2011 1:14 am

@Xezus wrote:i still like the addition of either game winning goals (which occurs in every game) and or shorthanded points which might result in some ties, but i feel like with such a large roster, it wont be nearly as bad as a normal league.
i still think it'd be nice to have both but at least GWG. in the end i think we can all agree to add that one as a compromise. 🐰

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by nostratimus on Wed Feb 02, 2011 5:35 am

I like the idea of both to balance out goalie/player significance. Definitely GWG though.
avatar
nostratimus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Admin on Wed Feb 02, 2011 7:57 am

I dont see the significance in GWG. Please enlighten me! I feel all it would be doing is adding more value to players that score goals. Why not game winning Assists? Just seems like GWG are more of a luck thing. When the goal was scored.

To me it's like having Home Runs and Clutch Home Runs. Any guy that hits home runs will benefit.

Please help me understand wanting this! bounce

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Xezus on Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:22 am

well it rewards clutch players sometimes which is good, and yes it does reward goals, but in a league where we dont have an overall points category (G+A=Points) i think GWG is a decent stat. G and assists are pretty much an even stat right now and i think GWG wont resort in ties, and will give more value to guys who can put it in the net especially in a tie situation.

More or less we are just trying to come up with ideas to stop the limited number of goalies from being super valuable in our league.

Also what about having a double edged sword and include shot percentage? that way we reward players who are more accurate?

Just an idea, idk if yahoo even keeps track of that but im sure they do, i see it on the player cards all the way to the right.

_________________

avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Admin on Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:57 am

G -- Goals;
A -- Assists;
P -- Points;
+/- -- Plus/Minus;
PIM -- Penalty Minutes;
PPG -- Powerplay Goals;
PPA -- Powerplay Assists;
PPP -- Powerplay Points;
SHG -- Shorthanded Goals;
SHA -- Shorthanded Assists;
SHP -- Shorthanded Points;
GWG -- Game-Winning Goals;
SOG -- Shots on Goal;
SH% -- Shooting Percentage (Rotisserie, Head-to-Head Only);
FW -- Faceoffs Won;
FL -- Faceoffs Lost

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Admin on Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:00 am

G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, FW, GWG

W, SHO, GAA, SV%

??? How's this lineup?

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Xezus on Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:18 am

Those are fine with me. I like SOG as a cat if you guys dont want SHP just so we have less ties

_________________

avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Admin on Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:22 am

i dont want ties... ive never used SHP. if they're that scarce scratch it.

SOG is cool, not something that says much about a player, but is somthing to use to value one.

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Guest on Wed Feb 02, 2011 11:22 am

I do like +/- n SoG

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Guest on Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:31 pm

SOG it is! Twisted Evil Wink

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by nostratimus on Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:42 pm

SHG is a tie nightmare. Yeah, I like SOG too.

8:4 ratio in cats looks good
avatar
nostratimus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Xezus on Wed Feb 02, 2011 12:55 pm

yep so we got as a final stat setups as G,A, +/-, PPP, PIM, FW, SOG, GWG and W, SHO, GAA, SV%

does that work for everyone?

_________________

avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by nostratimus on Wed Feb 02, 2011 1:30 pm

let's put it to a vote.
avatar
nostratimus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum