TRADE TEMPLATE
NEW TEAM:
PLAYER > CONTRACT/REWORKED > RFA/UFA STATUS

IF Prior Team paying part of player Contract post as follows

PRIOR TEAM

PLAYER > CONTRACT PAYMENT

Headline News
Powered by RSS Feed Informer

Troy Murphy PF,C IND

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Xezus on Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:09 am

3rd year 18.75

hes just doing too well, he deserves a pay raise
avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:17 am

wow that is top 10 money

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Xezus on Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:37 am

ya well i didnt want to pay granger crazy money or kevin martin that much and im kinda stuck with only 2 RFA's for next year =/ ill bite the bullet
avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Xezus on Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:41 am

ahh shit i just re read the rules and can do 3 RFA match bids, shit shit shit hahahaha
avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:53 am

that sucks maybe you can pull it back, JI would allow you to haha

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:53 pm

a murphy pull back exception!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Admin on Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:01 pm

2 rfa's amigo

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Admin on Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:05 pm

Its a typo in the 2011 book. I copied baseballs rules and missed the edit.

Hoops 2 rfa
Baseball 3 rfa

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Xezus on Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:51 pm

ohh ok, well that makes me feel a little better
avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Admin on Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:11 pm

I'm going to veto the extension. Paying Troy Murphy $18.75M is too high considering he can use 1 of the 3 team options after the season.

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:15 pm

Bravo wrote:I'm going to veto the extension. Paying Troy Murphy $18.75M is too high considering he can use 1 of the 3 team options after the season.

Is this for real or a joke, I'm having a hard time telling. Either way it doesn't matter I just want to know.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Xezus on Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:16 pm

my bad, its midterm week, and my brain is running slow... my apologeeze
avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Admin on Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:26 pm

it's for real. im not approving an extension for 19m for troy murphy when he can give him an option after the season.

i explained to him other options and he didnt realize he could do that.

all transactions go through the commissioners office in pro sports so why shouldnt they here too.

Admin
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:44 pm

Bravo wrote:it's for real. im not approving an extension for 19m for troy murphy when he can give him an option after the season.

i explained to him other options and he didnt realize he could do that.

all transactions go through the commissioners office in pro sports so why shouldnt they here too.

Like I said I don't have a problem with it, but money given to players I don't think that concerns the commish. Ron Artest should have got a lot more this year but decided to play in LA, I don't think the commish can block that cause a guy should get more or less money than the Commish thinks

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:55 pm

i would normally have a prob with something like this too

but i think bravo's point is valid. philly wasnt aware of the rule changes (due to all the voting and such) and acted under the old system

now, if philly STILL wants to do this, then it should be okay. but given that he can use a team option, i highly doubt he does

commish is just doing a commish thing here and thats being fair

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:00 pm

Like I said I don't care if Philly wants to do it or not, it is up to him I'm just making sure it is his decision and not the Commish's

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Guest on Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:01 pm

yeah, i think commish only vetoed cuz philly wasnt aware of new rule- which is fair, considering all the changes

ill leave it up to philly to chime in on how he wants to proceed

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Xezus on Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:08 pm

ya i would much rather use the option than the extension, i remember a while back having a dilemma with having only 2 RFA matches and having murphy, martin, and granger all ending their contracts the same year, then i realized we dont have much longer to assign extensions, and i totally forgot about the new option system we put into place, didnt know if i could do that this year, or start with it next year... so ya i would much rather use the option than the extension. Once again, srry for the mixup
avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: Troy Murphy PF,C IND

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum