TRADE TEMPLATE
NEW TEAM:
PLAYER > CONTRACT/REWORKED > RFA/UFA STATUS

IF Prior Team paying part of player Contract post as follows

PRIOR TEAM

PLAYER > CONTRACT PAYMENT

Headline News
Powered by RSS Feed Informer

RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Consecutive Years for RFA eligibility

100% 100% 
[ 12 ]
0% 0% 
[ 0 ]
 
Total Votes : 12

RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by Xezus on Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:40 pm

Our current rules read

Restricted Free Agent Eligibility (Veterans):
Completed a 3-6 year Pro contract (not including options).
Spent a minimum of 2 full consecutive seasons with the current team.
Never been listed on waivers.
None of the player's salary paid by another team.
Had any club options picked up.

I would like to open up the discussion and vote for decreasing the minimum consecutive years down from 2 to 1.5

1.5 years essentially being that the player was obtained prior to the trade deadline of the year, then kept all of the following year.

If passed this would apply to all players traded so far this year that have 2 years remaining on their 3 year deals.

I will start voting sometime tomorrow after i get some feedback and hear some opinions.

So post opinions please


Last edited by Xezus on Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:37 am; edited 1 time in total

_________________

avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by ericdm70 on Fri Feb 15, 2013 4:50 pm

I like the change. Restricted Rights are traded in the NHL without any minimum amount of time. So if we have any rule, this seems good.

_________________
TROLL'IN AIN'T EASY!

I OPEN BIDS SO LAZY PEOPLE DON'T HAVE TO...
avatar
ericdm70
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by DmanofGod1 on Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:37 pm

fine with me

_________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
avatar
DmanofGod1
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by Guest on Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:20 am

I would be fine with the proposed change.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by bshirt7 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:35 am

i have no problem with the change
avatar
bshirt7
Dedicated Member
Dedicated Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by Xezus on Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:37 am

Vote is up

_________________

avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by GoPackGo on Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:53 pm

voted
avatar
GoPackGo
Super Poster
Super Poster


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by DmanofGod1 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:57 pm

Yea i voted too

_________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
avatar
DmanofGod1
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by BossSquig on Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:17 am

Voted yesterday
avatar
BossSquig
Contributor
Contributor


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by nostratimus on Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:39 am

voted
avatar
nostratimus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by London (Kiefer) on Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:32 am

Voted
avatar
London (Kiefer)
Super Poster
Super Poster


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by bshirt7 on Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:21 pm

voted
avatar
bshirt7
Dedicated Member
Dedicated Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by Xezus on Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:25 pm

well that was easy enough... haha

_________________

avatar
Xezus
Premium Member
Premium Member


Back to top Go down

Re: RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum