TRADE TEMPLATE
NEW TEAM:
PLAYER > CONTRACT/REWORKED > RFA/UFA STATUS
IF Prior Team paying part of player Contract post as follows
PRIOR TEAM
PLAYER > CONTRACT PAYMENT
Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
Michigan receives: Carlos delfino + syd 2014 2nd
Sydney receives: Tobias Harris + JJ Hickson (Michigan pays 50% of hickson salary)
Sydney receives: Tobias Harris + JJ Hickson (Michigan pays 50% of hickson salary)
thebarnes23- Dedicated Member
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
Also it's 4am so going to sleep now. Will check
Again when I get up.
Again when I get up.
thebarnes23- Dedicated Member
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
Accept
I'm paying 2.5/3/3.5 of hickson's contract
I'm paying 2.5/3/3.5 of hickson's contract
_________________
"If it doesn't matter who wins or loses, then why do they keep score? "
"If you can accept losing, you can't win."
Vince Lombardi
bshirt7- Premium Member
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
Hey i voiced my 2 cent. Sam said it something Thai, Sam, You and I were going to talk about.
I don't have veto power in HOOPS. & J.J. Hickson is no D Wade either!
I don't have veto power in HOOPS. & J.J. Hickson is no D Wade either!
_________________
HELLFISH- Premium Member
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
hhahahahaaha just fuckin around
yea, waiting on sam
he's gonna have this addressed tonite i guess
yea, waiting on sam
he's gonna have this addressed tonite i guess
Guest- Guest
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
In the future please list the contract amount and terms in the trade page please.
MistaDuMa- Dedicated Member
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
No prob, sorry I will get used to listing the contracts from now on.
As far as the 50% salary stuff from all the discussion my two cents worth - I get why it's an issue for some and a genuine concern, having said that in my opinion you can really put limits on it, most of the time it's going to be used to get rid of a not so great player on a bad deal (Hickson) and rarely used with someone like wade - and I don't think it's right to define who is shit enough to have salary paid by someone else and who isn't, it's completely subjective. Having an overall limit could bury a team. Michigan is a case in point where he ha to clear roster room and salary but has a number of deals that haven't worked out and are now bad, there's no way he has a chance to overhaul a roster like that without the ability to offer incentive to take bad deals - like pay some of them. If he couldn't no way I do a deal with him. Tht makes him stuck with a bad roster for 3 years not able to compete OR to rebuild, that's when you have guy drop out of leagues and then you need to find someone to come in (like me) but I guarantee I don't come into this league to not be able to play for 3 years with a bad roster I can move some of!
Just my two cents but I think you give managers the option. If its a terrible move it's the same as someone trading lebron for JJ Hickson and you explore a veto, same thing.
As far as the 50% salary stuff from all the discussion my two cents worth - I get why it's an issue for some and a genuine concern, having said that in my opinion you can really put limits on it, most of the time it's going to be used to get rid of a not so great player on a bad deal (Hickson) and rarely used with someone like wade - and I don't think it's right to define who is shit enough to have salary paid by someone else and who isn't, it's completely subjective. Having an overall limit could bury a team. Michigan is a case in point where he ha to clear roster room and salary but has a number of deals that haven't worked out and are now bad, there's no way he has a chance to overhaul a roster like that without the ability to offer incentive to take bad deals - like pay some of them. If he couldn't no way I do a deal with him. Tht makes him stuck with a bad roster for 3 years not able to compete OR to rebuild, that's when you have guy drop out of leagues and then you need to find someone to come in (like me) but I guarantee I don't come into this league to not be able to play for 3 years with a bad roster I can move some of!
Just my two cents but I think you give managers the option. If its a terrible move it's the same as someone trading lebron for JJ Hickson and you explore a veto, same thing.
thebarnes23- Dedicated Member
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
Approved.
JJ Hickson loses his RFA rights since 50% of his contract is paid off
JJ Hickson loses his RFA rights since 50% of his contract is paid off
_________________
itssamman- Premium Member
Re: Michigan/Sydney trade hoops
I'm sure I'll live without having him under restricted free agency... May not live through his 3 years if he doesn't start to get better! Haha.
thebarnes23- Dedicated Member
Similar topics
» Michigan and Sydney hoops trade
» Sydney/Michigan trade HOOPS
» Michigan Sydney hoops trade mark 2
» Michigan/Sydney SH trade
» PHI/Sydney Hoops trade
» Sydney/Michigan trade HOOPS
» Michigan Sydney hoops trade mark 2
» Michigan/Sydney SH trade
» PHI/Sydney Hoops trade
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum