TRADE TEMPLATE
NEW TEAM:
PLAYER > CONTRACT/REWORKED > RFA/UFA STATUS
IF Prior Team paying part of player Contract post as follows
PRIOR TEAM
PLAYER > CONTRACT PAYMENT
Statistics (FCC Vote)
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Stats?
Statistics (FCC Vote)
This is the default. Seems pretty reasonable. This good or any other ideas...
Fowards/Defensemen: Goals, Assists, Plus/Minus, Powerplay Points, Penalty Minutes, Shots on Goal
Goalies: Wins, Shutouts, Goals Against Average, Save Percentage
Fowards/Defensemen: Goals, Assists, Plus/Minus, Powerplay Points, Penalty Minutes, Shots on Goal
Goalies: Wins, Shutouts, Goals Against Average, Save Percentage
Admin- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
i still like the addition of either game winning goals (which occurs in every game) and or shorthanded points which might result in some ties, but i feel like with such a large roster, it wont be nearly as bad as a normal league.
Xezus- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
i still think it'd be nice to have both but at least GWG. in the end i think we can all agree to add that one as a compromise.Xezus wrote:i still like the addition of either game winning goals (which occurs in every game) and or shorthanded points which might result in some ties, but i feel like with such a large roster, it wont be nearly as bad as a normal league.
Guest- Guest
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
I like the idea of both to balance out goalie/player significance. Definitely GWG though.
nostratimus- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
I dont see the significance in GWG. Please enlighten me! I feel all it would be doing is adding more value to players that score goals. Why not game winning Assists? Just seems like GWG are more of a luck thing. When the goal was scored.
To me it's like having Home Runs and Clutch Home Runs. Any guy that hits home runs will benefit.
Please help me understand wanting this!
To me it's like having Home Runs and Clutch Home Runs. Any guy that hits home runs will benefit.
Please help me understand wanting this!
Admin- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
well it rewards clutch players sometimes which is good, and yes it does reward goals, but in a league where we dont have an overall points category (G+A=Points) i think GWG is a decent stat. G and assists are pretty much an even stat right now and i think GWG wont resort in ties, and will give more value to guys who can put it in the net especially in a tie situation.
More or less we are just trying to come up with ideas to stop the limited number of goalies from being super valuable in our league.
Also what about having a double edged sword and include shot percentage? that way we reward players who are more accurate?
Just an idea, idk if yahoo even keeps track of that but im sure they do, i see it on the player cards all the way to the right.
More or less we are just trying to come up with ideas to stop the limited number of goalies from being super valuable in our league.
Also what about having a double edged sword and include shot percentage? that way we reward players who are more accurate?
Just an idea, idk if yahoo even keeps track of that but im sure they do, i see it on the player cards all the way to the right.
Xezus- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
G -- Goals;
A -- Assists;
P -- Points;
+/- -- Plus/Minus;
PIM -- Penalty Minutes;
PPG -- Powerplay Goals;
PPA -- Powerplay Assists;
PPP -- Powerplay Points;
SHG -- Shorthanded Goals;
SHA -- Shorthanded Assists;
SHP -- Shorthanded Points;
GWG -- Game-Winning Goals;
SOG -- Shots on Goal;
SH% -- Shooting Percentage (Rotisserie, Head-to-Head Only);
FW -- Faceoffs Won;
FL -- Faceoffs Lost
A -- Assists;
P -- Points;
+/- -- Plus/Minus;
PIM -- Penalty Minutes;
PPG -- Powerplay Goals;
PPA -- Powerplay Assists;
PPP -- Powerplay Points;
SHG -- Shorthanded Goals;
SHA -- Shorthanded Assists;
SHP -- Shorthanded Points;
GWG -- Game-Winning Goals;
SOG -- Shots on Goal;
SH% -- Shooting Percentage (Rotisserie, Head-to-Head Only);
FW -- Faceoffs Won;
FL -- Faceoffs Lost
Admin- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
G, A, +/-, PIM, PPP, SHP, FW, GWG
W, SHO, GAA, SV%
??? How's this lineup?
W, SHO, GAA, SV%
??? How's this lineup?
Admin- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
Those are fine with me. I like SOG as a cat if you guys dont want SHP just so we have less ties
Xezus- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
i dont want ties... ive never used SHP. if they're that scarce scratch it.
SOG is cool, not something that says much about a player, but is somthing to use to value one.
SOG is cool, not something that says much about a player, but is somthing to use to value one.
Admin- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
SHG is a tie nightmare. Yeah, I like SOG too.
8:4 ratio in cats looks good
8:4 ratio in cats looks good
nostratimus- Premium Member
Re: Statistics (FCC Vote)
yep so we got as a final stat setups as G,A, +/-, PPP, PIM, FW, SOG, GWG and W, SHO, GAA, SV%
does that work for everyone?
does that work for everyone?
Xezus- Premium Member
Similar topics
» Statistics Pt. 2 (FCC Vote)
» FCC RFA Waivers (Vote)
» RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)
» IR Cap Exception Vote (FCC)
» Divisions Vote FCC
» FCC RFA Waivers (Vote)
» RFA Eligibility (FCC VOTE)
» IR Cap Exception Vote (FCC)
» Divisions Vote FCC
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum